The collapse of the FTX exchange in November 2022 has had a significant impact on the crypto landscape in the United States.

The subsequent fallout from this unexpected financial crash has prompted the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to take a tougher stance on crypto companies.

In an attempt to restore order and regain its reputation, the SEC has increased the number of anti-crypto applications and lawsuits filed against industry players.

However, questions have been raised about the agency’s motives and its failure to prevent the FTX fraud. Let’s delve deeper into this evolving situation.

Increased Controls and Lawsuits:

Since the FTX case, the SEC has witnessed a surge in applications filed against crypto-friendly companies within US federal districts. In the six months leading up to the $8 billion exchange collapse, the SEC had filed only six cases related to cryptocurrencies.

However, in early 2023, the number of cases jumped to 19. While the SEC claims these actions aim to combat wrongdoing and protect investors, some argue that they are primarily an attempt to salvage the agency’s reputation.

Complexity and Regulatory Challenges:

Recent indictments against major players like Binance and Coinbase have shed light on the complex corporate structures behind these entities.

Binance, as a global company operating in an industry that lacks full regulation, faces the challenge of navigating various legal and regulatory landscapes.

Critics argue that the SEC’s actions fail to demonstrate the unsustainability or danger posed by these businesses, suggesting that the agency may be acting in bad faith.

Controversial Motives and Allegations:

French Hill, a member of the House of Representatives, has openly criticized the SEC’s anti-crypto crackdown, suggesting that it is merely a self-protective measure.

Speculation has also arisen regarding the potential involvement of Gary Gensler, the SEC’s Executive Chairman, in the FTX scam.

While there are connections between Gensler and individuals associated with FTX, it is important to note that these associations alone are not sufficient to prove fraudulent collusion. However, they do raise doubts and underline the need for transparency.

The Ripple CEO’s Perspective:

Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, has accused the SEC of using its recent anti-crypto actions to distract from its own negligence in the FTX debacle.

He argues that the agency should have prioritized more serious issues instead of focusing on less significant matters like celebrity endorsements of crypto scams.

These criticisms highlight the need for the SEC to reevaluate its approach and ensure that it addresses the most pressing concerns in the crypto industry.

Looking Ahead:

The SEC’s increased scrutiny and actions against the crypto sector in the aftermath of the FTX collapse have sparked debates and controversies.

The agency’s motives and past handling of the FTX case have been called into question, raising concerns about fairness and accountability. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the SEC will navigate these challenges and regain trust within the crypto community.